Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alizée Gaillard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Linguist111 (talk) 19:11, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alizée Gaillard

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about a person who may not meet notability guidelines. Linguist111 (talk) 16:10, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Linguist111, give us your reasons. Savvyjack23 (talk) 17:58, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Savvyjack23 The article does not give us very much info about Alizée, which probably means she hasn't had much notable success. Like many other Top Model winners' articles. It seems the only notable thing she's known for is winning France's Next Top Model, and she hasn't achieved as much success as notable Top Model contestants such as Ksenia Kahnovich, Patricia van der Vliet and Lena Gercke.

News Tell me if she still isn't notable Linguist111. It appears she is no longer just a "Top Model" contestant. Please do not propose a deletion without a simple check first. If you did so you would have known that. I've noticed that you have been consistently taking this approach with other articles since you joined Wikipedia in the second half of 2015. This is simply not how things work. I will not sugar coat a thing; if you continue to use this the wrong way I will make certain that your editing privileges are revoked. This was a waste of my time and everyone else's who seek to get involved. The page simply needs verification, which is a completely different approach. Savvyjack23 (talk) 18:13, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.